Ceramic Vs Steel Bottom Bracket

If there is one thing we see a lot in comments sections about ceramic bearings it is people claiming ceramic bearings do not offer benefits and are not.

Ceramic vs steel bottom bracket.

When analyzing the individual components that contribute to the total frictional losses of a bottom bracket the frictional losses due to the seals and lubricant is greater than the frictional losses. Ceramic bottom brackets ceramic oversized derailleur pulleys tools and accessories ceramic bearings vs. For bottom bracket applications the maximum sustained rpm may be 130 explains lew. Ceramic bearing equipped bottom brackets or hybrid ceramics to be more precise are generally much more expensive than their stainless.

Zerø ceramic bearings and bottom bracket proven time and again in world cup race conditions zerø ceramic bearings are the ultimate race day weapon. Ceramic bearings are in actual fact hybrid. Quality hybrid ceramic bearings are better than steel bearings in a bicycle bottom bracket application because they have rounder balls for lower resistance better races for lower resistance and are grease efficient in low rpm low heat environments for lower resistance. Ak posted by ard kessels.

The ceramic balls are often silicon nitride or equivalent. While the first two items were more prevalent distinguishers between ceramic and steel bearings in the past today there are often comparably built steel versions of a given bearing assembly. Bottom bracket efficiency is based on the design and the quality of materials not necessarily on the type materials i e ceramic vs. Which ones do you need.

Ceramic is not always better than steel. Silicone nitride si3n4 grade 3 balls roll on black oxide races ground to a mirror finish after receiving magnetite and cryogenic treatments for hardness and longevity. A bb30 bottom bracket that uses ceramic bearings will weigh 3 5 grams less than its stainless steel counterpart. They use ceramic balls and usually a steel inner and outer race.